NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCIENCE SCREENING REPORT OF THE APOLLO 7 MISSION

70-MILLIMETER PHOTOGRAPHY AND NASA EARTH RESOURCES

AIRCRAFT MISSION 981 PHOTOGRAPHY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepared By

JOHN L. KALTENBACH

EARTH RESOURCES DIVISION

                                                           

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER

HOUSTON, TEXAS

 

JUNE 1969

 

 

 

SCIENCE SCREENING REPORT OF THE APOLLO 7 MISSION

70-MILLIMETER PHOTOGRAPHY AND NASA EARTH RESOURCES

AIRCRAFT MISSION 981 PHOTOGRAPHY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUNE 1969

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Submitted by

John L. Kaltenbach

Earth Resources Division

Manned Spacecraft Center

Houston, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

            Scientists representing disciplines related to earth resources present preliminary interpretations of the 70-millimeter photography taken by the crew of the Apollo 7 spacecraft.  The photographs are compared with photographs taken at conventional aircraft altitudes and are evaluated regarding applications.  The individual photographic frames were examined with reference to important interpretation parameters.  Uses and benefits in the areas of land use planning, cartographic production, weather forecasting, oceanographic studies, regional geology, hydrological analyses, and agricultural surveys are described.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

Section                                                                                              Page

     

    I              SUMMARY…………………………………………….          

 

                             By John E. Dornbach and John L. Kaltenbach

   

    II             INTRODUCTION………………………………………

 

                             By John L. Kaltenbach

 

    III            APOLLO TRAJECTORY………………………………

 

                             By Samuel L. Miller

 

    IV           CAMERA SYSTEM…………………………………….

 

                             By Edward Yost and Robert Anderson

 

     V            GEOLOGY………………………………………………

 

                             By Paul D. Lowman

 

     VI          GEOLOGY……………………………………………….

 

                             By Malcolm M. Clark

 

      VII        GEOLOGY………………………………………………..

 

                             By Stephen J. Gawarecki

 

       VIII      GEOLOGY…………………………………………………

 

                             By Bruno E. Sabels

 

        IX       GEOLOGY………………………………………………….

 

                             By David L. Amsbury

 

 

 

 

Section                                                                                              Page

   

    X             OCEANOGRAPHY..……………………………………..

 

                             By I.D. Browne, James B. Zaitzeff, Victor E. Noble,

                             Don Ross, and Jack Paris

 

    XI           HYDROLOGY…………………………………………….

 

                             By Daniel G. Anderson

 

    XII          HYDROLOGY…………………………………………….

 

                             By Curtis C. Mason

 

     XIII        AGRICULTURE…………………………………………...

 

                             By Victor I. Meyers

 

     XIV        AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY……………………….

 

                             By Robert N. Colwell

 

     XV         RANGE RESOURCES……………………………………..

 

                             By Charles E. Poulton

 

     XVI        GEOGRAPHY………………………………………………

 

By Robert H. Alexander, Leonard W. Bowden, Duane F. Marble, David S. Simonett, and Jack E. Wilson

 

XVII       CARTOGRAPHY……………………………………………

 

                                    By Robert Nugent

 

     XVIII     METEOROLOGY……………………………………………

                  

                             By Kenneth M. Nagler and Stanley D. Soules

 

 

 

 

 

Section                                                                                                        Page

 

    XIX         METEOROLOGY………………………………………………

 

                             By William Norberg and William Shenk

 

    XX          METEOROLOGY……………………………………………….

 

                             By Victor S. Whitehead

 

    XXI         SPATIAL RESOLUTION IN MULTIBAND IMAGERY………

 

                             By Phillip N. Slater

 

APPENDIX A – APOLLO 7 MISSION DATA AND INFORMATION LIST

                             FOR 70-MILLIMETER COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY……...

 

APPENDIX B – EARTH RESOURCES AIRCRAFT PROGRAM AND MISSION

                             PLAN FOR MISSION 981…………………………………

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLES

 

Table                                                                                                 Page

 

XIII-I           AGRICULTURE FEATURES THAT PROBABLY

                             CAN BE RECOGNIZED FROM SPACE……………

 

XIV-I          COMPARISON OF APOLLO 6 AND 7 PHOTOGRAPHS..

 

XVI-II         PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR SUBSEQUENT EXPLOIT-

                             ATION OF APOLLO 7 PHOTOGRAPHY………….

 

XVIII-I        SUMMARY OF PHENOMENA PHOTGRAPHED……….

 

    A-I          FRAMES PERTAINING TO EACH DISCIPLINE………...

 

    A-II         SCREENING INFORMATION LIST……………………….

 

    B-I          EARTH RESOURCES AIRCRAFT PROGRAM MISSION

                             SUMMARY

 

(a)   Flights made October 14 to 20, 1968……………………..

(b)  Flight made October 22, 1968…………………………….

 

    B-II         AIRCRAFT MANIFEST

 

(a)   October 14 to 20, 1968…………………………………….

(b)  October 22, 1968…………………………………………..

 

    B-III        MISSION 981 SCHEDULE

 

(a)    October 14 to 20, 1968……………………………………..

(b)   October 22, 1968…………………………………………...

   

    B-IV        MISSION 981 INSTRUMENT SUMMARY…………………..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIGURES

 

Figure                                                                                                          Page

 

  V-I            Mexico, Gulf of California, central Baja California,

                             Mainland north of Guaymas……………………………..

 

  V-2            Iran, Persian Gulf Coast………………………………………...

 

  V-3            Brazil, Uruguay, Atlantic coast, Lagoa dos Patos,

                             Lagoa Mirim……………………………………………..

 

  V-4            United Arab Republic, Gulf Kebar Plateau……………………..

 

  V-5            Mexico, Bahia de Petacalco, Balsas River………………………

 

  V-6            Sinai Peninsula, Gulf of Suez, Gulf of Aqaba…………………...

 

XVIII-1       Hurricane Gladys centered off west coast of Florida, at 15:31

 G.m.t., October 17,1968…….…………………………….

 

XVIII-2       Hurricane Gladys photographed from ESSA-7 (meteorological

                             Satellite), October 17, 1968………………………………..

 

XVIII-3       Eye of typhoon Gloria (western Pacific Ocean) taken at

                             00:26 G.m.t., October 20, 1968…………………………….

 

XVIII-4       Typhoon Gloria photographed from ESSA-7 at 05:05 G.m.t.,

                             October 20, 1968……………………………………………

 

XVIII-5       Northerly view of Oahu in the Hawaiian Islands taken at

                             00:01 G.m.t., October 15, 1968……………………………..

 

XVIII-6       Supiori and Biak Islands in Indonesia are surrounded by the

                             Reflection of the sun at 02:19 G.m.t., October 22,1968…….

 

   A-1           World Apollo Index Map, Western Hemisphere………………….

 

   A-2           World Apollo Index Map, Near East………………………………

 

 

 

 

Figure                                                                                                          Page

 

   A-3           World Apollo index Map, Far East………………………………..

 

   A-4           Apollo photographic coverage enlargement of Baja

                             California area………………………………………………

 

   A-5           Apollo photographic coverage enlargement of Sinai

                             Peninsula area……………………………………………….

 

   A-6           ONC Index of Western Hemisphere……………………………….

 

   A-7                    ONC Index of Eastern Hemisphere………………………………...

 

   B-1           Test sites…………………………………………………………….

 

   B-2           Colorado River Delta Map………………………………………….

 

   B-3           Texas-Arizona Map…………………………………………………

 

   B-4           Central Texas Map………………………………………………….   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. SUMMARY

 

By John E. Dornbach and John L. Kaltenbach

Earth Resources Division

 

NASA Manned Spacecraft Center

Houston, Texas

 

EARTH RESOURCES BRIEFING AND SCIENCE SCREENING OF THE APOLLO 7 MISSION 70 –MILLIMETER PHOTOGRAPHY AND NASA EARTH RESOURCES AIRCRAFT MISSION 981 PHOTOGRAPHY

 

      An earth resources briefing and science screening of the Apollo 7 mission 70-mm photography and NASA Earth Resources Aircraft Mission 981 photography held at the NASA Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) on November 14 and 15, 1968.  The Earth Resources Division (ERD), Science and Applications Directorate (S&AD), with the support from the Mapping Sciences Laboratory (MSL), was responsible for conducting this briefing, for the science screening, and for subsequent dissemination of the photography.  The primary purpose of the preliminary screening was to permit invited scientists and photographic interpreters from other NASA centers, user agencies, and academic institutions to study and evaluate orbital and related aircraft photography for possible use in the meteorology and earth resources disciplines.

 

      On the morning of November 14, initial briefings on the photography were given to 24 visiting scientists an approximately 20 MSC scientist.  After these briefings, the scientists, representing their respective disciplines, met with ERD Scientific Discipline Group Leaders at the MSL for the science screening of the Apollo 7 photography and the NASA Earth Resources Aircraft Mission 981 photography.  Upon completion of the science screening, user agency representatives and other invitees were asked to provide, individually or by scientific discipline group, written contributions to be compiled into a science screening report by the ERD.  The following comments represent a summary of the science screening contributions of the photography.

 

APOLLO 7 PHOTOGRAPHY

 

Science Discipline Evaluation

 

      Geology. -        For geologic utility, the Apollo 7 photography must be considered more comparable to Gemini photography than to Apollo 6 photography.  As a result of the obliquity of the majority of the views, true shapes of surface features tend to be distorted or obscured.  In geology, the main use of oblique photography is to show an introductory view, or a complementing view to vertical photography. 

 

      Oceanography. – The repetition of the Apollo 7 photography over certain areas, such as the Gulf of California, affords the opportunity for viewing of specific areas under different camera angles, sun angles, and atmospheric conditions and also provides a record of dynamic feature changes.  For example, sea-surface patterns in the Gulf of California are enhanced by sunglint on this photography and were not evident on previous space photography which shows no sunglint. 

 

 

Hydrology. – For hydrologic purposes, the Apollo 7 photography, although less useful because of the many oblique views, will be useful for the following purposes:

 

1.      General descriptive hydrology of river basins, lakes, irrigated land uses, etc.

2.      Qualitative analysis of bottom topography and sediment transport using the more oblique views that occur near sunglint areas.

3.      semiquantitative measurements of bottom topography and sediment transport using the near-vertical photography in which sunglint is not very close to the area of interest.

Agriculture-forestry-rangeland resources. – Brushlands, timberlands, and grasslands can be fairly well differentiated on some of the views of the southwestern United States.  A few of the photographs, although they are oblique views, are useful for evaluation of vegetation and related resource features.

 

Geography. – the two major areas of use of the Apollo 7 photography in geography in geography are in urban analysis and in land-use and regional planning.  A land-use study of the internal structure of New Orleans can be made, and land-use and regional planning studies from space photography of the Imperial Valley and the California Coast can be continued.

 

Cartography. – The additional coverage of the Apollo 7 photography is of some value for photomosaic preparation, including extending the coverage of photomosaics and photomaps compiled from Gemini and Apollo 6 photography.  Certain areas covered by previous space photography can be studied to determine the value of this type of photography as a means of detecting changes for purposes of updating existing maps.

 

Meteorology. – Sufficient “cloud street” views occur in the Apollo 7 photography, over known locations and at known times, to provide useful information for the study of this phenomenon.  Atmospheric dynamics can be studied from the views of Hurricane Gladys and Typhoon Gloria.  Additional characteristics of sea-breeze effect, clearing over lakes and rivers, and structure over mesoscale systems can be gained from viewing this photography.

 

Photographic Image Quality Evaluation

 

Earth photography was not a primary objective of the Apollo 7 flight, and no provision was made for use of attitude control during photography.  The following circumstances, which either degrade the image quality or reduce the effective potential of orbital photography, are included as a guide for the planning and conducting of future missions.

     

1.                Numerous frames were either overexposed or underexposed, and there appeared to be a lack of exposure uniformity between individual frames.

2.                Emulsion streaks similar to those on the Apollo 6 photography were evident throughout the type SO-121 film.

3.                Many of the photographs were high obliques which make photointerpretative analysis and measurement extremely difficult.

4.                There were few of the sequential, stereoscopic photographs which are basic for most scientific analyses.

5.                Certain water-land interfaces and desert areas of the world, which were previously photographed, were again photographed many times.  These areas, although presenting spectacular views from space, have almost always been exposed in oblique and nonsequential views, which decreases their value for scientific analyses.

6.                Eastman Kodak color duplicating film, type 5386, was used to duplicate transparencies from the original type SO-121 film.  Although this film produces high-quality copies, type SO-118 duplicating film has been expressly designed to reproduce the high resolution of type SO-121 film.

 

Recommendations for Future Photographic Missions

 

Recommendations for future photographic missions include the following:

 

1.         Spacecraft photographic missions should be planned in detail prior to the mission so that a photographic plan properly coordinated with the experiments and crew activities is available for training purposes.

2.         The electric camera-shutter tripping mechanism should be integrated in some way with a recording system to correlate frame numbers with ground elapsed time (g.e.t.) and to determine a more exact spacecraft position at the instant a photograph is taken.

3.         If possible, all photography to be used for scientific analysis should be taken in vertical or near-vertical orientation (image plane of a camera parallel to ground) and with 60-percent overlap in the direction of flight.

4.         A preplanning and a target-aiming chart with exposure data for specific sun elevations should be prepared.  Experiments which differ radically from each other should be programmed for acquisition in order not to interfere with experiments which require optimum exposure.

5.         Photographs taken during the Gemini and Apollo missions can be used to study earth resources of a regional nature.  For more detailed studies, higher resolution or multiband photography would be required.

6.         Spacecraft windows should be designed so that they will permit a minimum of 50-percent transmission of the electromagnetic spectrum from approximately 0.4 to 0.9 micron.

7.         Special care should be taken to reduce redundant oblique coverage of a specific target of opportunity.  This recommendation does not suggest either elimination of the sequential, vertical and stereoscopic coverage of an area for photographic analysis or redundancy designed to fulfill periodic objectives of certain experiments.

8.         On future photographic missions, enough attitude-control fuel must be allotted to the photographic portion of the mission so that the spacecraft can be maneuvered and maintained in position for optimum photographic data acquisition.

                                               

NINETY-DAY SCIENCE REPORT

 

            Representatives of the user agencies, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and other invitees were asked to participate in the preparation of a 90-day science report.  The participating scientist were requested to forward to MSC by February 28, 1969, results of scientific analysis of the Apollo 7 photography within this time interval and conclusions reached regarding the value of the Apollo 7 space photography in the meteorology and earth resources disciplines.  The Earth Resources Division plans to publish this 90-day science report on the Apollo 7 photography in a format similar to that used for the Apollo 6 Mission science report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                 II.      INTRODUCTION

 

By John L. Kaltenbach

NASA Manned Spacecraft Center

Houston, Texas

 

 

            On October 11, 1968, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration launched a manned spacecraft from Cape Kennedy, Florida.  This flight, designated the Apollo 7 mission, orbited the earth 10.8 days and splashed down on October 22, 1968.

 

            Two of the experiments scheduled during this mission were to obtain synoptic terrain photography and synoptic weather photography.  The objectives of the Synoptic Terrain Photography Experiment were to obtain high-quality photographs (with color and black and white film) of selected land and ocean areas for geologic, geographic, and oceanographic study and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of color versus black and white film.  Nadir photographs were desired, particularly in sequences of three or more overlapping frames.  The objective of the Synoptic Weather Photography Experiment was to secure photographic coverage of as many as possible of the 27 basic categories of weather phenomena planned for coverage during the Apollo 7 mission.

 

            For the experiments, a Hasselblad 500-C (NASA modified) 70-mm format camera was used with a Zeiss Planar, 80-mm –focal-length, f/2.8 lens.  Kodak film types SO-368, SO-121 and 3400 were exposed, using Wratten 2A, 25A(red), and 58(green) filters.  More than 500 photographs (appendix A) were taken during the Apollo 7 mission.

 

            Color, color infrared, and multiband photography taken during NASA Earth Resources Aircraft Mission 981 (appendix B) within a week prior to, during, and after the Apollo 7 flight (of selected areas in the southern United States) as well as U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) color photography flown during the Apollo 7 mission, was available for comparative studies with Gemini, Apollo 6, and Apollo 7 photography during the science screening on November 14 and 15, 1968.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

III.   APOLLO TRAJECTORY

 

By Samuel L. Miller

NASA Manned Spacecraft Center

Houston, Texas

 

 

            Orbital insertion occurred at approximately 10 min 27 sec g.e.t. into a 123-by153-n. mi. ellipse.  At 1 hr 46 min 30 sec g.e.t., the Saturn IVB (S-IVB) had completed its safing, and the ellipse was 123 by 167 n. mi.  At 2 hr 55 min 2 sec g.e.t., the command and service module (CSM) separated from the S-IVB over Hawaii and stationkept over the United States.  The first phasing maneuver to set up the rendezvous conditions 23 hours later occurred at 3 hr 20 min 10 sec g.e.t.  This maneuver was a retrograde DV of  5.7  fps performed with the service module (SM) reaction control system (RCS).  The SM was targeted to place the CSM approximately 75 n. mi. ahead of the S-IVB at 26 hr 25 min g.e.t.  The resultant CSM ellipse was 122 by 164 n. mi.

 

            During the next six revolutions, the S-IVB orbit was found to be decaying more rapidly than had been anticipated.  This unexpected decay could have been caused by some type of venting through the J-2 engine, since the S-IVB was in retrograde orbital rate attitude.  A second phase maneuver of 7 fps retrograde was therefore performed with the SM RCS at 15 hr 52 min g.e.t.  The resultant ellipse was 120 by 165 n. mi.

 

            The first secondary propulsion system (SPS) burn was corrective combination maneuver which occurred at 26 hr 24 min 56 sec g.e.t., when the CSM was approximately 84 n. mi. ahead of the S-IVB.  The duration of the external DV was 9.4 seconds and was targeted to achieve the proper phase and height offset at the time of the second SPS burn.  The first SPS burn was nominal, with a resultant ellipse of 125 by 195 n. mi.

 

            The second SPS burn was a coelliptic maneuver which occurred at 28 hr 0 min 56 sec g.e.t., when the CSM was approximately 82 n. mi. behind and 7.7 n. mi. below the S-IVB.  The duration of the burn was 7.9 seconds.  The burn was targeted to achieve a coelliptic orbit with the S-IVB.  The resulting CSM 114-by 153-n. mi. elliptic orbit was approximately 8 n. mi. below the S-IVB.

 

            The terminal phase initiation maneuver was performed at 29 hr 16 min 45 sec g.e.t. and used the onboard computer solution based on sextant tracking of the S-IVB.  This 17-fps SM RCS burn was approximately 46 seconds in duration.  Following a small midcourse maneuver at approximately 29 hr 28 min g.e.t., the pilots began the braking phase at approximately 29 hr 47 min g.e.t. with final rendezvous closure to approximately 70 feet occurring at about 30 hr. g.e.t.  The ellipse at rendezvous was 121 by 160 n. mi.  Stationkeeping was terminated by a 2-fps SM RCS posigrade maneuver at 30 hr 20 min g.e.t.

 

            The ellipse at the end of the rendezvous was 121 by 160 n. mi.  The third SPS burn was targeted to lower perigee to 90 n. mi. and to place perigee in the northern hemisphere.  This 9.0-second maneuver occurred at 75 hr 48 min 00.3 sec g.e.t. and resulted in a 90-by160-n. mi. ellipse.  This maneuver lowered perigee to well within the  SM RCS deorbit capability and placed perigee in the northern hemisphere.  The in-plane velocity required to obtain a 90-by160-n. mi. ellipse was not sufficient to obtain a good stabilization control system (SCS) test; therefore, a DV of 200 fps was directed out of plane to the south.  The SPS burn time allowed a good SCS test as well as adjusted the propellant level for the propellant utilization gaging system (PUGS) test on the fifth SPS burn.

 

            The fourth SPS burn was an SPS minimum-impulse test of 0.5- second duration.  This maneuver occurred at 120 hr 43 min 0 sec g.e.t.  The velocity component was directed in-plane posigrade to raise perigee slightly.  This maneuver resulted in a 90-by156-n. mi. ellipse.

 

            The fifth SPS burn was targeted to position the ground track at the end of the mission so the primary revolution for the SPS deorbit burn (revolution 163) would have at least 2 minutes of Hawaii track and the next revolution would provide a backup SM RCS deorbit from apogee with touchdown occurring at a longitude of 60°  west and north of the islands.  This shift of the orbital plane was accomplished by the large out-of-plane component of velocity directed southward in combination with an orbital period adjustment.  An overburn of approximately 50 fps occurred because of late cut-off, but did not perturb the trajectory significantly, and the target conditions were achieved.  The fifth burn, a 67.1-second burn, occurred at 165 hr 0 min 0.47 sec g.e.t. with resultant ellipse being 91 by 250 n. mi.

 

            The sixth burn was second SPS minimum-impulse test lasting 0.5 second.  The maneuver, occurring at 210 hr 08 min 0.47 sec g.e.t. was directed out of plane since no change to the 90-by 236-n. mi. ellipse was desired.

 

            The seventh SPS burn was targeted to place perigee in revolution 165 at a longitude of 53° west.  This was accomplished by rotating the line of apsides approximately 30° to the west with the 7.7-second burn at 239 hr 6 min 11.97 sec g.e.t.  The in-plane velocity required to obtain the desired rotation was all radial..  To avoid the problems of executing a completely radial maneuver, a DV of 100 fps was directed out of plane to the north.  The out-of-plane velocity increased the burn time, and a better SCS test was obtained.

 

            The eighth SPS burn was the deorbit burn.  This 11.8-second burn occurred over Hawaii at 259 hr 39 min 16.3 sec g.e.t.  The spacecraft touched down approximately 30 minutes later at a latitude 27° 38’ north and longitude 64°11’ west.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IV.              CAMERA SYSTEM

 

By Edward Yost and Robert Anderson

Long Island University

Brookville, New York

 

 

            Image quality varies widely from frame to frame, and the largest factor in poor quality is incorrect exposure.  With proper exposure, image quality is very good.  The high penetration characteristic of type SO-121 film, as compared to type 368 film, yields much better results when exposure is a factor.  Though underexposure of type SO-121 film results in a magenta tint, many of the underexposed frames on this film hold details which should be recoverable with individual frame photographic reproduction techniques.  Although time did not permit a detailed examination of Gemini and previous Apollo photography, the high ration of oblique to vertical photography and the inconsistency of exposure indicate no significant overall advance in Apollo 7 photography.

 

            Preliminary screening of the photography shows potential use of a number of the frames in a study of offshore topography, currents, sediment distribution, et cetera.  Multispectral stratigraphic techniques would, in future photographic missions, be expected to enhance the amount of data available for study in oceanography, as well as geology, agriculture, and forestry.  A more detailed study of the photography should indicate geographic areas of interest for further study by other techniques.

 

            Future photographic missions would be expected to yield more data for earth resources studies if fuel could be extended to orient the space vehicle for vertical photography and if a team of scientists were consulted in the determination of areas to be photographed.  A greater array of photographic equipment could be expected to yield a greater amount of data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

V.                 GEOLOGY

 

By Paul D. Lowman

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland

 

 

THE APOLLO 7 TERRAIN PHOTOGRAPHY EXPERIMENT (S005)

 

      Of the more than 500 photographs obtained during  the Apollo 7 mission, approximately 200 are usable for the purposes of this experiment.  In particular, a few near-vertical, high-sun-angle photographs of  Baja California, other parts of Mexico and portions of the Middle East will be useful for geologic studies than those obtained on previous missions.  The first extensive photographic coverage of northern Chile, Australia, and several other areas were obtained.  A number of areas of oceanographic interest, particularly islands in the Pacific Ocean, were photographed for the first time.  The objective of comparing color with back and white photography of the same areas was not successful because of problems with focus, exposure and filters.

 

      A hand-held, modified 70-mm Hasselblad 500C camera with an 80-mm focal-length lens was used for this photography experiment.  Type SO-121 film was used for the synoptic weather and terrain experiments, and type SO-368 film was used for both the operational and the experiment photography.  A type 2A filter was used with all but one of the magazines containing type SO-121 film, and no filter was used with type SO-368 film.

 

      In general, the color and exposure quality of the pictures on type SO-368 film was excellent.  Some problems were encountered in exposing type SO-121 film, and many frames were either underexposed or overexposed.  The need to hurriedly change the film magazines, filters, and exposure settings when a target came into view probably accounts for the improper exposure of many frames.  Another factor contributing to underexposure was the use of a 1° field-of –view spotmeter to determine exposure settings of the camera which has a field of view of approximately 52°.  By using corrective photographic processing techniques, many of the exposure problems can be corrected.

 

      Sharpness ranged from fair to excellent on both films, with steadiness in holding the camera a probable factor in those frames containing blurred images. Swells on the sea surface were resolved on both films.

 

      Subsequent paragraphs describe regional